June 2026
Summary outlining the results of the Evaluation of the iZEV and iMHZEV Programs at Transport Canada.
On this page
Background
Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improving on-road decarbonization are key goals of the federal government. As passenger vehicles make up approximately 25% of Canada's GHG emissions, the federal government has aimed to support emissions reduction by mandating the sales of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). As a result, the iZEV and iMHZEV Programs were introduced to improve ZEV uptake in Canada.
About the evaluation
The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency/economy of the iZEV Program. It also examined the implementation to date, including the design and delivery, of the iMHZEV Program.
Program information
iZEV
- Introduced in 2019
- Targeted light-duty passenger ZEVs
- Provided up to $5,000 at the point of sale for buying/leasing an eligible ZEV
- Limit of one incentive per calendar year for individuals and 10 incentives per calendar year for businesses/organizations
- Stackable with provincial/territorial incentives but not with business tax write-offs through the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
- Program ended in March 2025
iMHZEV
- Introduced in 2022
- Targeted medium- and heavy-duty ZEVs
- Provided between $5,000 and $200,000 at the point of sale for eligible ZEVs in classes 2B to 8
- Limit of 10 incentives or a value of $1 million in incentives per calendar year
- Stackable with provincial/territorial incentives and with business tax write-offs through the CRA
- Program ended in March 2026
Evaluation methods
- 17 interviews
- 30+ documents
- Analysis of data from the ZEV Council dashboard, the ZEV portal, and Statistics Canada
Findings
- There was a need for a federal incentive program for light-duty ZEVs to increase ZEV adoption.
- The iZEV Program has contributed to the increase in ZEV uptake in Canada.
- There are several barriers that limit the uptake of ZEVs in Canada.
- TC’s collaborative work with other government departments, provinces/territories, and external organizations helped to ensure that ZEV policy was effective.
- The uptake of the iMHZEV Program was slower than anticipated because of the unique factors affecting the medium- and heavy-duty ZEV context.
- The point-of-sales incentive process worked well to provide incentives efficiently to consumers.
- Backlogs in iZEV incentive reimbursements to dealerships caused some dissatisfaction among participating dealerships.
Lessons learned
- More emphasis on ZEV awareness and knowledge building, especially within the trucking/freight industry, is needed.
- Keeping a thorough version history of any changes made to the claims process and operational improvements that resulted in efficiency gains would help ensure knowledge transfer to future incentive programs.
- Considering more targeted approaches for future ZEV incentive programs could help to promote affordability and reduce free-ridership.
- Implementing a government-wide dashboard would be beneficial to show progress toward larger on-road decarbonization goals, in addition to information on ZEV uptake.