The corrections or updated instructions below correct minor typos or errors in interpretation which may have let to incorrect test results.
Sort the columns by Page(s) to list the corrections by their location in the Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Test Procedures, or by Date posted to list the corrections by the date they were posted.
Test Procedure No. |
Page(s) |
Date the correction was posted |
Original text |
Corrections or updated instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 |
Pages 21 and 22 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
Test 1, 2 and 3 (mandatory): ELD can establish a link with the engine ECM and receive information through each serial (SAE J1587/J1708), CAN (SAE J1939) and (SAE J1979/OBD-II) engines communication protocol. Description of Test Step(s): Test 3 (ECM communication protocol – SAE J1979/OBD-II):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol (250 Kbps and 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedures specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully received information for the engine’s power status, vehicle’s motion status, total distance driven value, and engine hours’ value. |
Precondition(s):
Description of Test Step(s): Test 3 (ECM communication protocol – SAE J1979/OBD-II):
Expected Test Step Outcome: For each communication protocol supported by the ELD a test was performed Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol supported by the ELD (250 Kbps and/or 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedures specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully received information for the engine’s power status, vehicle’s motion status, total distance driven value, and engine hours’ value. Corrections: Precondition, test 3, step g), expected test step outcome for test 2 changed. Note added in expected test step outcome. |
4.3.1.2. |
Page 27 |
2021-08-18 |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: User powered on the CMV’s engine and authenticated into the ELD using a driver user account. User kept the engine idling for 5 minutes and the ELD was successfully set to a “stopped” state and allowed for driver input. User put the CMV in motion and maintain a vehicle speed lower than the set speed threshold for 1 minute. The ELD remained in a “stopped” state and, allowed for driver input. User accelerated to a vehicle speed greater than the set speed threshold and maintained that speed for 1 minute. Once the vehicle speed exceeded the set speed threshold, the ELD successfully set and maintained the “in motion” state and did not allow any driver input. User brought back the CMV to a stop. After the CMV remained stationary for 3 consecutive seconds, the ELD was successfully set to a “stopped” state and allowed for driver input. User logged out. |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: User powered on the CMV’s engine and authenticated into the ELD using a driver user account. User kept the engine idling for 5 minutes and the ELD was successfully set to a “stopped” state and allowed for driver input. User put the CMV in motion and maintain a vehicle speed lower than the set speed threshold for 1 minute. The ELD remained in a “stopped” state and, as per the requirements of provision 4.3.2c), did not allow User accelerated to a vehicle speed greater than the set speed threshold and maintained that speed for 1 minute. Once the vehicle speed exceeded the set speed threshold, the ELD successfully set and maintained the “in motion” state and did not allow any driver input. User brought back the CMV to a stop. After the CMV remained stationary for 3 consecutive seconds, the ELD was successfully set to a “stopped” state and allowed for driver input. User logged out. * The CMV is stationery and vehicle speed stays at 0 km/h for 3 consecutive seconds requirement stated at step k) is a minimum, additional measures to ensure the vehicles is or remains stationary are acceptable. Corrections: Test 1, steps f), h), j), k), expected test step outcome changed. A * (note) was added |
4.3.1.2. |
Page 29 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol (250 Kbps and 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully received vehicle speed information from the engine’s ECM |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: For each communication protocol supported by the ELD a test was performed Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol supported by the ELD (250 Kbps and/or 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully received vehicle speed information from the engine’s ECM. Corrections: Precondition, expected test step outcome test 2 changed. Note added in expected test step outcome. |
4.3.1.3 |
Pages 33 and 34 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
Description of Test Step(s): Test 3 (ECM communication protocol - SAE J1979/OBD-II):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol (250 Kbps and 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully received vehicle speed information from the engine’s ECM |
Precondition(s):
Description of Test Step(s): Test 3 (ECM communication protocol - SAE J1979/OBD-II):
Expected Test Step Outcome: For each communication protocol supported by the ELD a test was performed Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol supported by the ELD (250 Kbps and/or 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully monitored the engine ECM’s odometer message and use it to report total vehicle distance information in the driver’s RODS. Corrections: Precondition, test 3, step a), expected test step outcome test 2 changed. Note added in expected test step outcome. |
4.3.1.3 |
Pages 35 and 36 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol (250 Kbps and 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully monitored the engine ECM’s odometer message and use it to report accumulated vehicle distance since engine’s last power on instance. |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: For each communication protocol supported by the ELD a test was performed Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol supported by the ELD (250 Kbps and/or 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. ELD successfully monitored the engine ECM’s odometer message and use it to report accumulated vehicle distance since engine’s last power on instance. Corrections: Precondition, expected test step outcome test 2 changed. Note added in expected test step outcome. |
4.3.1.4 Precondition(s) |
Page 42 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
|
Precondition(s):
Corrections: Precondition changed. |
4.3.1.4 |
Pages 44 and 45 |
2021-08-18 |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol (250 Kbps and 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. The ELD successfully monitored the engine ECM’s total engine hours message broadcast and use it to record elapsed and total engine hour information. |
Precondition(s):
Expected Test Step Outcome: For each communication protocol supported by the ELD a test was performed Test 2 (SAE J1939): For each communication protocol supported by the ELD (250 Kbps and/or 500 Kbps baud rate), user performed the test procedure specified in previous Test 1. The ELD successfully monitored the engine ECM’s total engine hours message broadcast and use it to record elapsed and total engine hour information. Corrections: Precondition, expected test step outcome test 2 changed. Note added in expected test step outcome. |
4.3.1.6 |
Pages 49 and 50 |
2021-08-18 |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
|
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
Corrections: Test 1, step n) changed. |
4.3.2.1. |
Page 61 |
2021-03-23 |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
|
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
Corrections: Test 1, steps b) and c) changed. |
4.3.2.1. |
Page 62 |
2021-03-23 |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
|
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1:
Corrections: Test 1, steps b) and d) changed. |
4.3.2.2.4 |
Page 94 |
2021-03-23 |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1 (driver function):
Test 2 (support personnel function):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: User performed Test Procedure 4.3.2.2.4-2 (Test 1) without logging out. ELD successfully prompted the user to affirmatively review and confirm the new cycle (cycle 2) and new duty-/driving-hour limitations. User logged out. Test 2: User performed Test Procedure 4.3.2.2.4-2 (Test 2) without logging out. ELD successfully prompted the user to affirmatively review and confirm the new cycle (cycle 2) and new duty-/driving-hour limitations. User logged out. |
Description of Test Step(s): Test 1 (driver function):
Test 2 (support personnel function):
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: User performed Test Procedure 4.3.2.2.4-2 (Test 1) without logging out. ELD successfully prompted the user to affirmatively review and confirm the new cycle Test 2: User performed Test Procedure 4.3.2.2.4-2 (Test 2) without logging out. ELD successfully prompted the user to affirmatively review and confirm the new cycle Correction: Test 1 and test 2, steps b), expected test step outcome changed (cycle 2) to (cycle 1). |
4.3.2.8.2 |
Page 148 |
2021-03-23 |
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: User authenticated into the ELD using a support personnel user account and navigated to the driver’s RODS (driver 1 and driver 2). For the current day, neither driver was respectively indicated in each other’s RODS as a co-driver, and the ELD successfully did not allow the ELD username associated with a driving record to be edited and reassigned. For the previous day… |
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 1: This Test is to be performed only if the function at provision 4.3.3.1.3 is available on the ELD. User authenticated into the ELD using a support personnel user account and navigated to the driver’s RODS (driver 1 and driver 2). For the current day, neither driver was respectively indicated in each other’s RODS as a co-driver, and the ELD successfully did not allow the ELD username associated with a driving record to be edited and reassigned. For the previous day… Instruction: Test procedure at provision 4.3.2.8.2 / test step 6 / test 1 is to be performed only if the function at 4.3.3.1.3 (page 163) is available on the ELD. |
4.3.2.8.2 |
Page 151 |
2021-03-23 |
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2: Users successfully authenticated in as a support personnel user account. User … |
Expected Test Step Outcome: Test 2: This Test is to be performed only if the function at provision 4.3.3.1.3 is available on the ELD. Users successfully authenticated in as a support personnel user account. User … Instruction: Test procedure at provision 4.3.2.8.2 / test step 7 / test 2 is to be performed only if the function at 4.3.3.1.3 (page 163) is available on the ELD. |