On this page
- 1 Policy objective
- 2 Policy statement
- 3 Scope
- 4 Authority
- 5 Responsibility
- 6 Related documents
- 7 Date of application
- 8 Date for review or expiry
- 9 RDIMS Reference
- 10 Keywords
- Annex I – Penalty range for the Interim Order Respecting the Discharge of the Sewage and the Release Greywater by Cruise Ships in the Canadian Waters
1 Policy objective
1.1 This policy provides guidance on the assessment of an appropriate administrative monetary penalty for the non-compliance by the person or vessel subject to the Interim Order Respecting the Discharge of Sewage and the Release of Greywater by Cruise Ships in Canadian Waters made by the Minister of Transport pursuant to s. 10.1(1) of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, c. 26 (the Act).
2 Policy statement
2.1 A non-compliance may be proceeded with as a violation or as an offence in accordance with s. 233 of the Act; the Minister may commence proceedings in respect of that non-compliance as a violation or recommend that it be proceeded with as an offence, but it may proceed only as one or the other.
2.2 Any person or cruise vessel who fails to comply with the Interim Order commits a violation for the purposes of s. 229 to 243 of the Act, as set out in s. 711 of the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2, S.C. 2018, c. 27 (BIA), and may be issued an administrative monetary penalty ranging from $250 to $250,000.
2.3 The Regional Enforcement Unit (REU) will apply a gradual escalation of penalty amounts, which will conform to the prescribed range of penalties identified in s. 711 of the BIA and progress according to the severity of the non-compliance from the baseline dollar value as determined in the Annex I of this policy for the specific non-compliance, to a maximum of $250,000 per incident.
2.4 If a non-compliance continued for more than one day it would constitute a separate violation for each day on which it is continued as per s. 711 of the BIA, and penalty up to a maximum of $250,000 for each violation, but in any event, not greater than the maximum fine if the violation were proceeded with by way of summary conviction.
2.5 To ensure that an administrative monetary penalty has the desired effect, the REU will analyze and assess the appropriate penalty amount within the range, according to the factors identified in the Departmental Enforcement Standards, such as the severity of the violation, the behavior and the history of non-compliance of the regulated entity.
3 Scope
3.1 This policy applies solely to the application of administrative monetary penalties for non-compliance with the Interim Order Respecting the Discharge of Sewage and the Release of Greywater by Cruise Ships in Canadian Waters.
4 Authority
4.1 This policy is authorized by the Marine Safety and Security Executive and is in accordance with the objectives and authority of the Act.
5 Responsibility
5.1 MSS Regional Directors and the Regional Enforcement Units of the National Enforcement Program are responsible for the implementation of this policy.
5.2 The Director, Environmental Programs & Protection Standards is the functional director for the Interim Order Respecting the Discharge and the Release of Sewage and Greywater by Cruise Ships in the Canadian Waters.
5.3 The Executive Director of Domestic Vessel Regulatory Oversight is accountable for the development, maintenance, and continuous improvement of the policy.
5.4 Comments or queries related to this policy and its application should be addressed to the Manager Flag State Compliance and Enforcement, Domestic Vessel Regulatory Oversight (AMSDF), 330 Sparks St Ottawa ON K1A 0N8 or via insp.stand-norm.insp@tc.gc.ca.
6 Related documents
6.1 Canada Shipping Act, 2001, section 10.1 and Related Provisions, s. 711 of BIA
6.2 Administrative Monetary Penalties and Notices (CSA 2001) Regulations (SOR/2008-97)
6.3 Canada Shipping Act, 2001 - Marine Compliance and Enforcement Manual
6.4 Policy - Transitional policy for the enforcement of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act
6.5 Departmental Enforcement Standards
7 Date of application
7.1 This policy comes into effect on February 19, 2024.
8 Date for review or expiry
8.1 This policy shall be reviewed 12 months after coming into effect and at intervals not exceeding five years thereafter.
9 RDIMS Reference
9.1 The English version of this document is saved in RDIMS under reference number 20106096. The applied naming convention is Publication – TP13585 – Policy - Determining the penalty for non-compliance with interim order respecting the discharge and the release of sewage and greywater by cruise ships in the Canadian waters.
9.2 La version française du présent document est dans le SGDDI et porte le Numéro de référence 20106830. La règle d’affectation des noms est Publication – TP13585 – Politique – Détermination de la sanction pour une non-conformité de l’Arrêté d’Urgence relatif au rejet des eaux usées et à la Libération des eaux grises par les navires de croisière dans les eaux Canadiennes.
10 Keywords
- Enforcement
- Interim Order
- Discharge and the Release of Sewage and Greywater
- Cruise Ships in Canadian Waters
Annex I – Penalty range for the Interim Order Respecting the Discharge of the Sewage and the Release Greywater by Cruise Ships in the Canadian Waters
Table 1
Gradual Scale AMP Amounts
Gravity Classification of the Violation |
Baseline Penalty |
Maximum Penalty |
Aggravating Factor Level |
History of Non-Compliance |
Distance from nearest land |
Duration of Violation |
Volume Discharged |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | |||
Minor | $6,000 | $18,000 | None/Low | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Moderate | $6,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
High | $12,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Medium | $25,000 | $150,000 | None/Low | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Moderate | $25,000 | $12,500 | $12,500 | $12,500 | |||
High | $50,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | |||
Serious | $50,000 | $250,000* | None/Low | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Moderate | $50,000 | $19,125 | $19,125 | $19,125 | |||
High | $100,000 | $38,250 | $38,250 | $38,250 |
* See Table 3, Section 1
Table 2
Guidance for examples of Minor, Medium and Serious Violation with reference to Interim Order (Sewage and Grey Water)
Gravity of Violation Sewage / Grey Water | Criteria / Description |
---|---|
Minor |
Violations that are less serious and are typically administrative in nature. These may include, but are not limited to, failure to respect:
|
Medium |
More significant failures to comply with requirements such as:
|
Serious |
Violations that could create a risk of harm to people or the environment. This typically includes requirements relating to:
|
Table 3
Description of the aggravating factors
Aggravating Factors |
Level |
Description |
---|---|---|
History of Non-Compliance of AR / ISM Manager (B) |
None/Low |
No previous non-compliance |
Medium | One previous non-compliance | |
High | Two or more previous non-compliance | |
Distance of the discharge from the nearest land (C) |
None/Low |
More than 12 Nm |
Medium | More than 3Nm but not more than 12 Nm from shore | |
High | Not more than 3Nm from shore | |
Economic Benefit: Duration of Violation (D) |
None/Low |
Duration of Discharge Violation less than 5 minutes |
Medium | Duration of discharge violation between 5 minutes and 15 Minutes | |
High | Duration of Discharge Violation greater than 15 minutes | |
Volume Discharged [E] |
None/Low |
Less than 100 Liters |
Medium | Between 100 - 1000 Liters | |
High | Greater than 1000 Liters |
-
The amount for each of the aggravating factors is added to the baseline penalty:
AMP Amount = Baseline Penalty + (B) + (C) + (D) + (E)
*To a maximum of $250,000
-
The penalty amount may be adjusted +/- 30% on recommendation of the enforcement officer, if mitigating or aggravating factors not already specified in the table are present. If those factors are not already specified in the table, the penalty amount should then be adjusted with a comprehensive justification.
-
The regional director of the REU for the region responsible for the enforcement action, may assess and recommend a penalty that is below or above the value of the table, with a comprehensive justification, so long as the penalty stays within the range prescribed by the BIA ($250 to $250,000).