Overview
- The Fine Print
- Methodology
- Part 1 - Laboratory Based Testing
- Part 2 - Vehicle Based Testing
- Vehicle Testing Results Summary
1. The Fine Print
- Gross differences in tire performance differences (if any)
- NOT a tire ranking exercise
- Tire selection independent of manufacturer support
- Acquired through channels available to consumers
2. Methodology
- Lab Based Testing
- Vehicle Based Testing
3. Part 1 - Laboratory Based Testing
Purpose of Lab Tests
- Quantify performance differences
- Help correlate vehicle test results
Limitations
- Single tire sample per test
- Snow traction test is an outdoor test
- Weather dependent
- Relative
- Trends & gross differences only
- No ranking
Test to be Performed
- Rolling Resistance Measurement
- Smithers facility in Ravenna, OH
- Durability Testing
- Smithers facility in Ravenna, OH
- Snow Traction
- Smithers facility in Raco, MI
Rolling Resistance Results
Text Version of Figure 1
Text Version for Figure 2
Durability Testing
- Durability testing allows for qualitative comparison. It does NOT model or predict tire lifespan
- The base test only establishes a minimum level of performance for road worthiness
Durability Testing Results
Text Version for Figure 3
Text Version for Figure 4
Durability Testing Notes
- At its core, the durability test is only an acceptability test.
- Durability test does NOT model or predict lifespan.
Snow Traction Testing
- Based on ASTM F1805, modified for heavy truck tires
- Results are normalized against a “control” tire
- Forward (driving) traction only.
- No lateral component (such as cornering)
- No braking
Snow Traction Apparatus
Snow Traction Results
Text Version for Figure 5
Text Version for Figure 6
Lab Results Summary
- Rolling Resistance
- SmartWay-verified tires have much lower RR
- Durability
- Comparable to non-SmartWay-verified tires
- Snow Traction
- Comparable to non-SmartWay-verified tires
4. Part 2 - Vehicle Based Testing
Purpose of Vehicle Based Testing
- Does a SmartWay-verified designation entail a significantly reduced winter performance?
- Lab vs. Actual (vehicle based testing)
- Possible effects on vehicle interaction
Vehicle Setup
- Extensive instrumentation
- Vehicle computer
- GPS
- IMU
- Other additional data
Tests to be Performed
- Stopping Distance Measurement
- Turning Test
- On/off ramp analogue
Limitations
- Single configuration sample per test
- Weather dependent
- Trends and gross differences only
- No ranking
Stopping Distance Results
Text Version for Figure 7
Turning Test
- Simulation of on/off ramp
- Road holding ability
- 180 degree turn, 23 m radius
Turning Test Results
- Pass/Fail only
Turning Test Entry Speed | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tire
Configuration |
20 km/h | 25 km/h | 30 km/h | 35 km/h | ||
A/A | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL | ||
B/B | PASS | PASS | FAIL | not attempted | ||
C/C | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL | ||
C/D | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL | ||
E/E | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL | ||
F/F | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL |
Vehicle Testing Results Summary
- Stopping Distance
- Comparable to non-SmartWay-verified tires
- No adverse system interaction
- Turning/Road Holding
- Comparable to non-SmartWay-verified tires
- No adverse system interaction