Contents
- GOVERNMENT OF CANADA PS752 RESPONSE STRATEGY
- ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ACTIONS ON CANADA'S STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
- ANNEX A – PURSUING REFORMS TO ICAO ANNEX 13
- ANNEX B – SAFER SKIES INITIATIVE
- ANNEX C – CANADA'S RESPONSE AT ICAO COUNCIL REGARDING IRAN'S PS752 REPORT
- ANNEX D – STATE TO STATE NEGOTIATIONS
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA PS752 RESPONSE STRATEGY
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ACTIONS ON CANADA'S STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
|
Actions |
LEARNING LESSONS FROM PS752 |
CANADA TO DECIDE ON ONE OF THESE TOOLS (ANNEX C) |
State-to-State Negotiations |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Annex 13 Reforms (ANNEX A) |
Safer Skies (ANNEX B) |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
ICAO Intervention |
||||||||
|
OBJECTIVES |
Overall Likelihood of Scenario's Success |
[ATIP redacted] |
||||||||||
|
Improving safety of international civil aviation (preventing future aircraft downings) |
Strengthen Global Standard – Positive Impact |
Preventive measures/activities to address risks in/near Conflict Zones |
Not Applicable |
[ATIP redacted] |
Included in the Common Negotiating Position |
|||||||
|
A credible, transparent and impartial accounting of events that led to the downing of Flight PS752 |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Included in the Common Negotiating Position |
|||||||||
|
More credible, transparent and impartial investigations into future aircraft downing investigations |
A non-specific Declaration (no mention of Iran) may be perceived as a positive action |
Not Applicable |
||||||||||
|
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
Not Applicable |
||||||||
|
[ATIP redacted] |
||||||||||||
|
Suitable reparations for the families of the victims and States |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
|||||||||
|
Demonstrate action at the ICAO/international level to the families of the victims and to Canadians |
May address conflict of interest concerns raised by families |
Preventive measures/ activities to address risks in/near Conflict Zones |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
|||||||
|
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
As per ICAO Mechanism |
||||||||||
|
[ATIP redacted] |
N/A |
N/A |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
N/A |
||||||
* This matrix presents the best case scenario (i.e., all of the actions are successfully delivered)
** Necessary steps for successful delivery of each action is described in the "strengths" and "opportunities" sections of the analysis tables in the following annexes
ANNEX A – PURSUING REFORMS TO ICAO ANNEX 13
|
PURSUING REFORMS TO ICAO ANNEX 13 – ANALYSIS |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Strengths |
|
|
Weaknesses |
|
Opportunities |
|
|
Threats |
ANNEX B – SAFER SKIES INITIATIVE
ANNEX B – SAFER SKIES INITIATIVE
ANNEX C – CANADA'S RESPONSE AT ICAO COUNCIL REGARDING IRAN'S PS752 REPORT
COMPARISON OF PROPOSED ICAO INTERVENTION LANGUAGE
| Tool |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
Canadian Statement |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Intent |
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
Canada condemns Iran's failures |
|
Canada's proposed language |
[ATIP redacted] |
Canada:
Request for action
Annex 13 Reform
Safer Skies:
|
|
|
Considerations |
|
||
|
[ATIP redacted] |
[ATIP redacted] |
||
|
Key risks |
|
||
[ATIP redacted]
ANNEX D – STATE TO STATE NEGOTIATIONS
WORK FLOW
|
STRONG STATEMENT BY MINISTER OF TRANSPORT IN ICAO COUNCIL – ANALYSIS |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Strengths |
|
|
Weaknesses |
|
Opportunities |
|
|
Threats |