Commercial & Business Aviation
6.2.1 Overview
In AQP, data management is a continual process of data collection, entry, submission and analysis.
6.2.2 Data Collection
AQP data collection is required in all curricula. The specifics are detailed in the air operator’s AQP Data Collection and Analysis Plan, which are contained in the Implementation and Operations Plan (I & O Plan). Data is collected at each validation or evaluation gate. This data consists of graded proficiency objectives using a rating scale with associated reason codes (if applicable). Data collection requirements for the AQP will vary with the curriculum, the type of curriculum activity (training, validation, or evaluation), the type of participant (flight crewmember, instructor, or evaluator), and the overall management objectives for use of the data. Figure 6-1 illustrates the AQP data collection fields required for submission to Transport Canada. All performance data collected on each proficiency objective must be relative to the applicable Qualification Standards defined for the training and evaluation activities.
For each flight crewmember in a Qualification or Continuing Qualification Curriculum, Transport Canada must be able to associate the data records applicable for that flight crewmember in that curriculum through logical grouping of the records, or linkage by a common de-identified index number (but not by name).
6.2.3 Data Entry
All performance/proficiency data collected throughout the AQP is entered into the air operator’s PPDB. Typically, this is an electronic database for ease in analysis, comparison and reporting purposes. Considerations for data entry include the method, the hardware/software required for data input, and the hardware/software required for data storage and utilization. Distinct advantages, disadvantages and costs are associated with any method of data entry. Database design is at the discretion of the air operator, provided that the design can generate the required report table specified, in a manner acceptable to Transport Canada.
6.2.4 Data Submission
For the purposes of program oversight, Transport Canada has established the minimal requirements for the submission of de-identified data by curriculum. Figures 6-1 through 6-4 summarize the submission requirements in three tables. These tables are the Performance Data Report Table (PDRT ), the Skill Reason Table (SklRsn) and the Training Objectives Report Table (TORT). The information in these tables is downloaded from the air operator’s PPDB. The air operator is responsible to prepare de-identified data reports and check them for data integrity, and then to submit them to Transport Canada in 1 calendar-month blocks within 2 months of collection. Reports can be forwarded electronically to Transport Canada or made available by convenient means such as through web access. Transport Canada will analyze the de-identified data using standard automated queries and reports to identify AQP performance trends. Figures 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4 contain specifications for each field in the three tables.
- PDRT
The PDRT contains a listing of 23 fields that are reported for every measured item, providing a separate record for each. A measured item is a manoeuvre, task, procedure, or event set, and is the main component for data analysis. These fields provide a record of the results of the performance of each measured item along with supporting data for reporting and analysis. Certain supporting data fields (air operator designator, curriculum, etc.) repeat for each record and can be automatically generated from a query/software routine. Each field in the PDRT must contain either an alpha/numeric, numeric, or text entry. Figure 6-2 contains the specifications for each field, defines the meaning of each field item, and provides examples of the field values.
- SklRsn
With respect to the SklRsn table, an unsatisfactory rating (Mrate) of a measured item requires that a reason be entered to explain the rating. All reasons are entered in the SklRsn table in field No. 24, Skill Reason Text. This table allows the carriers to report more than one Skill Reason Text for an unsatisfactory rating of a measured item without having to enter multiple records. There are only two fields in this table.
- The first field is Field No. 5 (SklRsn), which is the same as in the PDRT and provides the linkage between the two tables. For each record in the PDRT where one or more Skill Reasons need to be reported, an identifier is entered in the SklRsn field that is unique to the measured item. This identifier can be a concatenation of the fields that make it unique. For instance: Fleet+EvalType+CmID+Mitem. As long as the identifier is unique to the record, it is the carrier’s discretion to determine which fields are used.
NOTE: If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that none of the component field contains an NA value.
- The second field in the SklRsn Table is the Skill Reason Text, the field that will contain descriptive text for each reason relevant to a particular measured item. For example: Systems Knowledge, Procedural, CRM, Technical Knowledge, etc.
- The first field is Field No. 5 (SklRsn), which is the same as in the PDRT and provides the linkage between the two tables. For each record in the PDRT where one or more Skill Reasons need to be reported, an identifier is entered in the SklRsn field that is unique to the measured item. This identifier can be a concatenation of the fields that make it unique. For instance: Fleet+EvalType+CmID+Mitem. As long as the identifier is unique to the record, it is the carrier’s discretion to determine which fields are used.
- TORT
The TORT table is comprised of training objective(s) associated with each measured item. It provides a means of auditing the relationship between the measured item and the task analysis, qualification standards, and the curriculum. There are four fields in this table. The TORT links to the PDRT through the first field, Measured Item ID (MItemID). The second field, Objective ID (ObjID) is an identifier assigned to each terminal proficiency objective (TPO) or supporting proficiency objective. The Objective ID may be the same as the Measured ID if it is a single TPO or SPO. However, in the case of a measured item that is an event set, there may be several training objective identifiers associated to the Measured Item ID. The third field, Objective Title (ObjTitle) is a text description of the training objective. The last field in this table is the Objective Type (ObjType) that identifies the training objective as a TPO, SPO, EO or as required by the air operator’s qualification standards structure.
Due to the unique features of each operator’s AQP, TC in consultation with the air operator may require the collection of additional data as deemed appropriate.
- File Naming Convention
Data submissions must use the file-naming format (xyzmmyya.mdb) as shown in the example below:On the following pages, Figure 6-1 lists the minimum AQP data submission requirements. Figure 6-2 provides the specification for each field in the PDRT. Figure 6-3 discusses the skill reason codes and supporting text applicable to the SklRsn table while Figure 6-4 on the topic of the TORT links training objectives with measured items.
Figure 6-1: DATA SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Training Program | Advanced Qualification Program | |||||||||||
Curriculum | Qualification | Continuing Qualification | ||||||||||
Table | # | Field | Short Name | SV | PV | MV | LOE | OE | FL | MV | LOE | OE |
Proficiency
Data Report Table |
1 | Measured Item | MItem | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req |
2 | Measured Item ID | MitemID | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
3 | Measured Item Rating* | Mrate | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
4 | Rating Meaning | Rmean | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
5 | Skill/Reason | SklRsn | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
6 | PF/PNF | PFPNF | N/A | N/A | DES** | Req | Req | Req** | DES** | Req | Req | |
7 | Is Currency Item? | Currcy | N/A | N/A | Req | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | N/A | N/A | |
8 | Is Critical Item | Crit | N/A | N/A | Req | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | N/A | N/A | |
9 | Crew ID | CrewID | Req*** | Req.*** | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
10 | Evaluation Date | EvalDate | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
11 | Air operator Designator | AirDsgn | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
12 | TC Fleet Designator | Fleet | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
13 | Training Program | TrPgm | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
14 | Curriculum | Curr | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
15 | Evaluation Type | EvalType | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
16 | TC Simulator ID | SimID | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | N/A | Req | Req | Req | N/A | |
17 | Evaluator ID | EvaltrID | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
18 | TC Inspector ID | TCID | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
19 | OE Geo. Area | GeoArea | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Req | |
20 | Comments | Comment | Des | Des | Des | Des | Des | Des | Des | Des | Des | |
21 | Crewmember ID | CmID | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
22 | Crew Position | CrewPos | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
23 | Evaluation Rating Type | EvalRtg | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | N/A | Req | Req | Req | |
Skill Reason
Table |
5 | Skill/Reason | SklRsn | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | Req | Req | N/A | Req | Req |
24 | Skill Reason Text | SklRsnText | N/A | N/A | Req | Req | Req | Req | N/A | Req | Req | |
Training
Objectives Report Table |
2 | Measured Item ID | MItemID | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req |
25 | Objective ID | ObjID | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
26 | Objective Title | ObjTitle | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | |
27 | Objective Type | ObjType | Des | Des | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req | Req |
Req | - | A required entry. | Qual | - | AQP Qualification Curriculum | PV | - | Procedures Validation |
N/A | - | If no value is to be entered, use N/A. Leave no blank fields. | CQ | - | AQP Continuing Qualification Curriculum | MV | - | Manoeuvres Validation |
Des | - | Desired. This is optional information that is not required, but desired for submission. If not submitted, then N/A must be entered as the value. | FL | - | First Look Manoeuvres | LOE | - | Line Operational
Evaluation |
*/** | - | See Notes in Data Reporting Format - Figure 6-2. | SV | - | Systems Validation | OE | - | Online Evaluation |
*** | - | If there is no crew pairing for Systems or Procedures Val, submit the single CmID (No. 21) for the crewmember. |
Figure 6–2: PERFORMANCE DATA REPORT TABLE (PDRT)
Table | No | Field | Description | Short
Name |
Type | Field
Size |
Example(s) | Notes |
PDRT | 1 | Measured Item | The task, manoeuvre, procedure, or event set statement. | Mitem | Text | 80 | Perform Engine Failure Procedure |
|
2 | Measured Item ID | An alphanumeric used to identify the task, manoeuvre, procedure or event set being graded. | MitemID | Text | 12 | 1.2.1.3
or KK73456 |
|
|
3 | Measured Item Rating | The numeric rating assigned on the first attempt for each measured item. | Mrate | Numeric | 1 | 3 |
|
|
4 | Rating Meaning | A description of the Measured Item Rating | Rmean | Text | 40 | Satisfactory |
|
|
5 | Skill/Reason | Link between the PDRT and SKLRSN tables | SklRsn | Text | 90 | B-737-LOE-5555-Taxi |
|
|
6 | PF/PNF | Indicates whether the pilot performing the Measured Item was flying or not flying. | PFPNF | Text | 3 | PF or PNF |
|
|
7 | Is currency Item? | Indicates whether the Measured Item is a currency item. | Currcy | Text | 3 | Yes, No or N/A |
|
|
8 | Is Critical Item | Indicates whether the Measured Item is a critical item. | Crit | Text | 3 | Yes, No or N/A |
|
|
PDRT | 9 | Crew ID | The de-identified alphanumeric assigned to a specific pairing of crewmembers that will be maintained for the duration of a curriculum, unless the crew make-up changes or a seat substitute is present. | CrewID | Text | 40 | P21234 SIC F12312
|
|
10 | (MM/YYYY) | The month and the year the Measured Item data is collected. | Date | Date | 7 | 10/2001 |
|
|
11 | Air operator
Designator |
The air operator’s four-character designator reporting the measured items. | AirDsgn | Text | 4 | XYZA | ||
12 | TC Fleet Designator | The TC designation of the fleet or equipment type relevant to the Measured Item. | Fleet | Text | 20 | B-737 |
|
|
13 | Training Program | The training program relevant to the Measured Item. | TrPgm | Text | 4 | AQP | ||
14 | Curriculum | The AQP curriculum in which the Measured Item is being validated or evaluated. | Curr | Text | 4 | Qual, CQ or N/A | ||
15 | Evaluation Type | The evaluation type in which the Measured Item is accomplished. | EvalType | Text | 4 | FL, SV, PV, MV, LOE, OE | ||
16 | TC Simulator ID | The TC simulator ID number of the simulator where the Measured Item is performed. | SimID | Text | 4 | 1234 or N/A |
|
|
17 | Evaluator ID | The identification number of the evaluator who graded the Measured Item. | EvaltrID | Text | 15 | 123456 |
|
|
PDRT | 18 | TC Inspector ID | The Form 110A number of the aviation safety inspector who observed the Measured Item. | TCID | Text | 4 | 1234 |
|
19 | OE Geographic Area | The geographic area where the Measured Item is collected for OE . | GeoArea | Text | 30 | Pacific |
|
|
20 | Comments | Additional comments submitted by evaluator. | Comment | Memo |
|
|||
21 | Crewmember ID | The de-identified alphanumeric assigned for the duration of a curriculum to the crewmember performing the measured item. | CmID | Text | 10 | P123456 |
|
|
22 | Crew Position | The “seat” occupied by the person performing the Measured Item. | CrewPos | Text | 4 | PIC | PIC = Pilot in Command
SIC = Second in Command FE = Flight Engineer E.g., a SIC or CRP in the left seat would be entered as PIC. |
|
23 | Evaluation Type Rating | The overall rating the pilot performing the Measured Item received for the evaluation type. | EvalRtg | Text | 5 | Sat or
Unsat |
|
Figure 6–3: SKILL/REASON TABLE (SKLRSN)
# | Field | Description | Short
Name |
Type | Field
Size |
Example(s) | Notes | |
SklRsn | 5 | Skill/Reason | Link between the PDRT and SKLRSN tables | SklRsn | Text | 90 | B-737-LOE-5555-Taxi |
|
24 | Skill reason Text | A description of the skill or reason for assigning an unsatisfactory Measured Item rating. | SklRsn Text | Text | 40 | Technical
CRM Procedural |
|
Figure 6–4: TRAINING OBJECTIVES REPORT TABLE (TORT)
# | Field | Description | Short
Name |
Type | Field
Size |
Example(s) | Notes | |
TORT | 2 | Measured Item ID | An alphanumeric used to identify the task, manoeuvre, procedure or event set being graded. | MitemID | Text | 12 | 1.2.1.3 or
KK73456 |
|
25 | Objective ID | An alphanumeric assigned to each terminal or supporting objective tested by the Measured Item. | ObjID | Text | 12 | 3.2 |
|
|
26 | Objective Title | A description of the objective ID | ObjTitle | Text | 80 | Perform Engine Fire Procedures |
|
|
27 | Objective Type | A description of the objective type | ObjType | Text | 5 | TPO or
SPO or EO |
|
6.2.5 Data Analysis
The primary users of data reports are air operator personnel and Transport Canada.
- Air Operator
AQP requires that the data collection conducted by the air operator for its own use in monitoring curricula will support more analytical detail and diagnostic functions than the data collected for submission to Transport Canada. Transport Canada expects the air operator to do an in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of the training. Reporting of data is based on the analysis of the PPDB to provide information on the curriculum and participant groups (flight crewmembers, instructors/evaluators). Once the data is collected and entered into the data management system (PPDB), an analysis should be performed on the aggregate information. Statistical analysis of the proficiency data enables air operators to make an internal assessment of their performance. Air operators should tailor these processes and techniques to suit their own requirements. Each air operator’s data collection and performance assessment processes should be refined over time, based on their own practical experience. That is, the measures and processes should be optimized on an iterative basis to provide the degree of discrimination in flight crewmember performance needed to establish effective quality control over AQP curricula.
- Transport Canada
The data submissions to Transport Canada are primarily ratings and reason codes associated with performance measures taken at validation and evaluation gates and supporting data. The data, presented to Transport Canada in the tables previously discussed is analyzed using the Canadian Data Analysis Reporting Tool (CDART) to allow a POI and other Transport Canada personnel to conduct trend analysis to monitor overall program effectiveness.